Peer Review Process
Transparent evaluation, independent scholarship, and academic integrity at every stage of publication.
Quality and integrity in every submission
Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Manajemen is committed to maintaining high standards of academic quality, research integrity, and scholarly contribution in the fields of economics, business, and management. All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo an editorial assessment and peer-review process to ensure their originality, relevance, methodological rigor, and academic value.
Double-Blind Peer Review
The journal applies a double-blind peer-review system in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review process. This system is intended to promote objective evaluation and minimize potential bias in editorial decisions.
Initial Editorial Screening
All submitted manuscripts are initially assessed by the Editorial Office or an assigned editor to determine their suitability for the journal.
- conformity with the journal's Aims, Focus and Scope;
- originality and contribution to economic, business, or management knowledge;
- relevance of the research problem and objectives;
- appropriateness of the theoretical framework and methodology;
- quality of data analysis and interpretation;
- clarity of academic writing and manuscript organization;
- accuracy and relevance of references;
- compliance with the Author Guidelines; and
- research ethics, originality, and potential conflicts of interest.
Manuscripts that do not meet the journal's requirements may be rejected without external review.
External Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are normally sent to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise in economics, business, management, finance, marketing, entrepreneurship, or related disciplines.
Reviewers are selected based on their academic expertise, research experience, methodological competence, and independence from the authors.
The Editor may seek additional opinions when reviewer recommendations differ substantially or when further assessment is necessary.
Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts according to the following criteria:
Originality and Contribution
The manuscript should provide new findings, theoretical insights, or meaningful contributions to existing literature.
Theoretical Foundation
The study should engage appropriately with relevant theories, concepts, and previous research.
Methodological Rigor
Research methods, data sources, sampling, measurement, and analytical procedures should be appropriate and clearly explained.
Analysis and Interpretation
Findings should be presented accurately and interpreted in relation to the research objectives and relevant literature.
Practical and Academic Relevance
The manuscript should contribute to the understanding of economic phenomena, business practices, managerial decisions, or organizational development.
Presentation and References
The manuscript should be clearly written, logically organized, and supported by reliable and relevant references.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and confidential assessments. They should identify relevant literature that has not been cited, disclose potential conflicts of interest, and notify the editor of suspected plagiarism or research misconduct.
Reviewers must not use unpublished information obtained through the review process for personal or professional advantage.
Editorial Decision
The Editor makes the final decision after considering reviewer recommendations, academic quality, relevance, originality, and compliance with publication ethics.
Accept without revisions
Accept with minor revisions
Major revisions and resubmission
Reject the manuscript
Revision Process
Authors must address reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript accompanied by a point-by-point response when revisions are requested.
If authors disagree with a reviewer's recommendation, they may provide a reasoned academic explanation.
Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation.
Review Timeline
The journal seeks to process manuscripts efficiently while maintaining rigorous academic standards. Review duration may vary according to reviewer availability, manuscript complexity, and the extent of revisions required.
Editorial communications are provided through the journal's official submission system or registered email address.
Confidentiality and Conflicts of Interest
Manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. Editors and reviewers must disclose actual or potential conflicts of interest and withdraw from the evaluation when their impartiality may be compromised.
Editorial Independence
Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit, originality, relevance, methodological quality, and ethical compliance. Financial considerations, institutional affiliation, and personal relationships must not determine publication outcomes.
Editorial Commitment
Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Manajemen is committed to fair, transparent, confidential, and consistent peer review to maintain the quality and integrity of published research.