Dominance of Political Dynasties : A Political Economy Perspective in Regional Election Simultaneous 2018 in Lebak Regency

Authors

  • Imron Wasi Pamulang University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53611/JPPGPS

Abstract

This study examines the intertwined political dominance of political families in the 2018 regional elections in Lebak Regency. The 2018 regional elections in Lebak were contested by only one candidate pair, Iti Octavia Jayabaya-Ade Sumardi. However, these candidates faced an empty ticket in the regional head election. Furthermore, the Mulyadi Jayabaya family, represented by his daughter, Iti Octavia Jayabaya, also faced resistance from the Barisan Juang Kotak Kosong (Empty Box Fighting Front). However, the growing political power of this political dynasty, driven by its use of patronage, clientelism, and boundary-closing strategies, significantly outperformed its competitors in the 2018 regional elections. The research method used was a qualitative approach based on case studies (Creswell, 2016). The results revealed that the superior political power of this political dynasty has created a pattern of patronage and clientelism that alienates other competitors in the political arena. This is because local politics is also filled with transactional politics.

References

Aspinall, Edward, and Ward Berenschot. 2019. Democracy for Sale: Pemilu, Klientelisme, Dan Negara Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, John W. 2016. Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dasgupta, Aniruddha, and Victoria A. Beard. 2007. “Community Driven Development, Collective Action and Elite Capture in Indonesia.” Development and Change: 229–49.

F.A. Hayek. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Fukuyama, Francis. 2005. Memperkuat Negara: Tata Pemerintahan Dan Tata Dunia Abad 21. ed. Dwi Helly Purnomo. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Giddens, Anthony. 2000. The Third Way Jalan Ketiga Pembaruan Demokrasi Sosial. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Heywood, Andrew. 2014. Politik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Ekonomic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69–106.

Neill, T.O, and G Hymel. 1995. All Politics Is Local: And Other Rules of the Game. Massachussets: Adams Media.

Novadona Bayo, Longgina, and Willy Purna Samadhi. 2018. “Pendahuluan: Melacak Ragam Rezim Lokal Di Indonesia.” In Rezim Lokal Di Indonesia: Memaknai Ulang Demokrasi Kita, eds. Longgina Novadona Bayo, Purwo Santoso, and Willy Purna Samadhi. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia dan PolGov Fisipol UGM dan University Oslo, 12.

Priyono, AE, and Usman Hamid, eds. 2007. Menjadikan Demokrasi Bermakna: Masalah Dan Pilihan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Demos.

Robison, Richard, and Vedi R. Hadiz. 2004. Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Sorensen, Georg. 2014. Demokrasi Dan Demokratisasi Prospek Dan Prospek Dalam Sebuah Dunia Yang Sedang Berubah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wasi, Imron. 2023. “Gerakan Politik Kotak Kosong Sebagai Oposisi Keluarga Politik Dalam Pilkada Calon Tunggal Iti Octavia Jayabaya- Ade Sumardi Di Lebak Tahun 2018.” Universitas Indonesia.

Wasi, Imron, and Panji Anugrah Permana. 2024. “Gerakan Politik Kotak Kosong Sebagai Oposisi Dinasti Politik Mulyadi Jayabaya Pada Pilkada Iti Octavia Jayabaya-Ade Sumardi.” Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia 50(1): 61–80. https://ejournal.brin.go.id/jmi/article/view/8688/6877.

Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarki. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Downloads

Published

08/24/2025

Issue

Section

Articles